Learn From Analysis of The Robert Collier Letter Book

Get inspiration from the analysis of Robert Collier Letter Book’s Ad Performance.

The Robert Collier Letter Book Cover
Robert Collier

Ads ran on 14.08-21.08.23
Started writing this analysis at 04.09.23

Get 1 or more leads during one week after launching the ad – Not reached.

Leads in the period of 14.08-21.08 - ConvertKit - Click to Open in New Window
Overall form visits - untill 04.09 - ConvertKit - Click to open in new window

Facebook Ad

I’m having trouble finding the clicks to reproduce metric, which appeared in other ads. So I contacted Facebook and am waiting for a resolution.

PPC Search Ad

I’ve got 0 impressions on the ad once again(happened a few times previously).
Even though I don’t think I changed anything since the last ad, which worked great. So I contacted Google Support to help me figure this out. Awaiting response.

YouTube Ad Analysis

Here are the results of the YouTube ad, in comparison to the last 3 YouTube ads.

METRIC

YOUTILITY

CONTENT INC.

CONTENT RULES

COLLIER
BOOK

Budget

10$~

20$~

10$~

10$~

Impressions

52,640

114,458

50,480

53,243

Views

1,026

2,477

995

1,164

Likes

13

39

18

11

CTR

1.94%

2.16%

1.97%

2,26%

View-to-like ratio

1.26%

1.57%

1.8%

0.91%

Average View Duration (During ad activity period)

0:30 (06-13 May)

0:30 (14-29 Apr)

0:32 (16-23 Jan)

0:35 (14-21 Aug)

What Does This Table Mean?

Initial Assumption

From the results of this ad, it initially appears that the content itself is lacking something, not the packaging- which is the thumbnail headline and subhead – The things you see before you click.

That is because:
A) Its CTR is higher than the other 3 – Indicating that the ad(packaging) performed well.
B) Its likes are lower than the other 3 – Indicating that after attracting the viewers, the content didn’t satisfy them.

 

Eliminating One Possible Cause - Testing That The Data Is Paid Only

I wasn´t sure that the likes of the other ads were measured strictly in the ad period and not a week of organic period too, so I double checked myself. The test is Illustrated in the table below in the parenthesis. If there´s a deviation from the original number, it is presented there.

METRIC

YOUTILITY

CONTENT INC.

CONTENT RULES

COLLIER
BOOK

Budget

10$~

20$~

10$~

10$~

Impressions

52,640 (Ad Google)

114,458(Ad Google~80)

50,480 (Ad Google)

53,243(Ad Google)

Views

1,026 (Ad Google)

2,477 (Ad Google)

995(Ad Google)

1,164 (Ad Google)

Likes

13(upload day- end of ad meaning +3 days before beginning of ad)

39 (Now 37)

18 (YouTube Analyrics)

11 (YouTube Analytics)

CTR

1.94%

2.16%

1.97%

2,26%

View-to-like ratio

1.26%

1.57%

1.8%

0.91%

Average View Duration (During ad activity period)

0:30 (06-13 May)

0:30 (14-29 Apr)

0:32 (16-23 Jan)

0:35 (14-21 Aug)

Test Result

Since the changes were minor, I decided not take them into account.
I think some people removing their likes, and minor adjustments in the google ad platform after the end of the ad might have been the cause.

Investigating Further

To further prove or contradict the Initial Assumption, I checked the 4 pieces’ retention and subscription rates.

 

Retention Rate

I found that both organic and paid viewership of Collier’s Book are either the same as the best performing video of the other 3 or better. (See the retention rate image below)

It was also longer than the other best performing videos, so when it has the same retention in percentage it’s actually longer. Which shows that it’s the video with the highest retention of the 4.

It therefore contradicts the initial assumption and shows that the content piece was interesting.

Retention Rate Comparison - Collier's Book is Equal Or Outperforms All Others - Click To Open In New Window

Subscription Rate

Collier’s Book was the second best in this metric too.
The results for the period when the ads ran were:
Youtility – 15
Content Inc. – 11
Content Rules – 8
Collier’s Book – 13

Subscriber Count Of The 4 Analyzed Videos - YouTube - Click To Open In New Window

The Reason For The Low Likes

So what did cause the reduction in likes?

Since subscriber and retention metrics show a different picture than the likes, it could make sense that the cause is a standard deviation, meaning that if the ad was to run longer, it would likely even out.

I would have stopped there, but, I have recently been testing new headlines for this content piece and together with the new ads it ran longer than the other ads, and it showed that the view-to-like ratio got even lower (about 0.66%) so standard deviation was probably not the reason.

What then?
One more thing could be the cause.

 

Possibly a Difference in Audiences?

When comparing audiences I found a complete mess. Each ad had different audiences targeted. This means that this might definitely be the cause for the lower likes. Previously I’ve been constantly targeting more and more channels that might have had my target audience. But this makes it difficult to analyze ad performance, since I now had up to 46 “places” which I targeted. Something I could do to avoid it for the next few ad analyses and have more accurate results is to find the best-performing “places”. By scanning the views number and view to like rates, I decided on 5 “places”. Attaching a PDF if you’d like to see further details.

Top 5 Performing
"Places"
From 4 Ads

    We respect your privacy. Unsubscribe at anytime.

    Bottom Line - What Is The Lesson?

     

    It’s difficult to point the finger at exactly what caused Collier’s Book to get 0 leads and fail at the set lead goal of 1 lead. But, I have found a possible cause which is the difference in audiences.
    To test this assumption, I’ll keep the same 5 audiences in the next few pieces unless something unexpected happens.

    5 Common Marketing Mistakes from 5 Known Marketing Books

    5 Marketing Mistakes for Entrepreneurs to Avoid

    Related Articles

    Was this article helpful?

    Leave a comment

    Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *